Member-only story

Ivan Ornelas
9 min readSep 28, 2021

--

If there was anything that could get me back into writing articles consistently, it would be Survivor. Granted, it did take me until the day before Episode 2 to write about the premiere. That will change after this article.

Reading articles from Entertainment Weekly and other sources were part of my inspiration to begin writing in general, let alone provide my own analysis on one of my favorite shows. Since Survivor 41 is considered the dawn of a new era, I am excited to try a different format. Rather than going chronologically from start to finish of an episode, I’ll cover some of the highlights and biggest topics, and then provide a brief player-by-player analysis. Lastly, I will give three players gold, silver, and bronze medals to acknowledge their gameplay. So without further ado, “come on in”!

Evolving an Iconic Phrase

This comes up not just in the initial marooning, but ahead of the immunity challenge as well. Jeff Probst asks the cast if the phrase “Come on in guys” should be retired? The premise of this being, that the term “guys” can be seen by some as exclusive against anyone who is not male. While guys has been used as a gender neutral term in some spaces, it is a question worth asking.

However, the way the show went about this felt like they were making a spectacle out of it. I understand many people who watch Survivor don’t realize the potential harm in using the word “guys”…

--

--

Ivan Ornelas
Ivan Ornelas

Written by Ivan Ornelas

Manchester United, Quakes, Roots, and Chivas fan. Primarily covering soccer, followed by other sports. Occasionally Writes about Reality TV and Games too.

Responses (1)